Legal Opinion

Stubblefield v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1940PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants, W. M. Mitchell and Montgomery Ward & Company, a corporation, from a judgment of the circuit court in the sum' of $1,942.60, based upon the verdict of a jury. The respondents, who were the plaintiffs, are husband and wife. Their cause of action was predicated upon charges that the defendants, after having contracted by written agreement to do some plumbing work for the plaintiffs, breached their contract through unwarranted delay and unskillful workmanship. The verdict and judgment are thus constituted:

Damages incurred through injury to plaintiffs’ building…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winslow Elevator & MacHine Co. v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  2. Williams v. Island City Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Noonan v. Independence Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Bridges v. LanhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Savage v. GlennOregon Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Douglas Construction Corp. v. Mazama Timber Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Pearson v. SchmittOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Shepherd v. Hub Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Smith v. ABELOregon Supreme Court · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API