Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Company v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1983No. 82-1349PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:

Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) appeals from an order of the district court dismissing Kodak’s action against Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (Commissioner), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1 Kodak sought review in the district court of a decision rendered by the Commissioner in a patent reissue proceeding. While the district court’s dismissal order is cursory, we perceive the rationale of the district court to be that the Commissioner’s decision was not a final agency action immediately subject to judicial review. We agree and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long Term Care Partners, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. Sierra Club, North Star Chapter v. BrownerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  3. Curtis Manufacturing Co. v. Plasti-Clip Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Independent Petroleum Ass'n of America v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  5. Virginia Beach Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n v. ReichDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API