Legal Opinion
Curtis Manufacturing Co. v. Plasti-Clip Corp.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided April 20, 1995No. Civil 89-430-SDPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Senior District Judge.
1. Plasti-Clip’s and Faneufs Motion in Li-mine to Exclude Any Reference to November 29, 1993, Rulings of Administrative Patent Judge on Preliminary Motions in Interference Proceeding (document 8JJ
Plaintiffs 1 filed a patent application intentionally seeking an interference with the ’078 patent in the Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) on February 20, 1991. Said interference was declared on February 22,1992, and assigned Interference Number 102,911. After the filing of preliminary statements, plaintiffs submitted a 37 C.F.R. § 1.633(a) preliminary motion 2 which…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Begier v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- In Re Omegas Group, Inc., Debtor. Xl/datacomp, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John R. Wilson, Trustee, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clark v. Wetherill (In Re Leitner)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Heidelberg Harris, Inc. v. Michael H. LoebachCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Fibre Form Corp. v. Slamin (In Re Nova Tool & Engineering, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- J & J Manufacturing, Inc. v. LoganDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1998
- Chemical Bank v. CoanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.