Justringz-Century III Mall v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs, State Board of Cosmetology

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this administrative agency appeal, JuStringz-Century III Mall, JuStringz-South Hills Village Mall (JuStringz), Sha-gufta Parveen (Parveen) and Nida Hassan (Hassan) (collectively, Petitioners) ask whether the State Board of Cosmetology (Board) erred in determining they violated Section 2 of the Beauty Culture Law (Law),1 by practicing cosmetology without a license. The Board determined Petitioners’ practice of “eyebrow threading,” which involves the removal superfluous facial hair, falls within the Law’s definition of “cosmetology,” and, therefore, requires a…