Constangy, Brooks & Smith, by Larry W. Bridgesmith on Behalf of Teledyne Industries, Inc., D/B/A Teledyne Still-Man v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board, defendant-appellant (NLRB or Board), has appealed from the decision of the district court, which had ordered the Board to produce two intra-agency memoranda pursuant to a request for records by Constangy, Brooks & Smith, plaintiff-appellee (Con-stangy or appellee). However, subsequent to filing the notice of appeal by the Board, both parties moved this court to dismiss the instant appeal as moot since the Board had delivered copies of the requested documents to the appellee.
The record revealed the following facts. On April 22, 1986,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Deakins v. MonaghanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Catherine Cotton v. I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, the Smithsonian InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Micah Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Van Schaack Holdings, Ltd. v. FulenwiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Ophelia Ford v. John S. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Seafirst Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Seafirst Corporation, and Davis, Wright & Jones, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, and Davis, Wright & Jones Marsh & McLennan Arthur Andersen & Co., Respondent-Intervenor, and Seafirst Corporation, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.