Legal Opinion

Deakins v. Monaghan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1988No. 86-890PublishedCited by 741 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

This case presents questions concerning a federal court’s obligation to abstain from the adjudication of federal claims *195arising out of an ongoing state grand jury investigation. We granted certiorari, 479 U. S. 1063 (1987), to consider whether the District Court, under Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37 (1971), was required to abstain from adjudicating respondents’ claims for injunctive relief, and, if so, whether the court had the discretion to dismiss, rather than to stay, respondents’ additional claims for damages and attorney’s fees. Because we have concluded that the first issue is now…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by741 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Eric Noel v. Brian C. Hall Sandra A. Hall, Fka Sandra Johnson, and Gabrielle S. Lennartz Herb Weisser Michelle A. MerchantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

736 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API