Legal Opinion

Van Schaack Holdings, Ltd. v. Fulenwider

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 10, 1990No. 88SC527PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rovira

We granted certiorari in this case to determine the proper disposition of a pending C.R.C.P. 54(b)1 appeal when the appellants voluntarily comply with the trial court’s order. In Van Schaack Holdings, Ltd. v. Fulenwider, 768 P.2d 740 (Colo.App.1988), the court of appeals held that the parties, in effect, had settled the case in accord with the district court’s order. Relying on the line of cases beginning with United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950), the court of appeals dismissed the appeal as moot and vacated the lower court’s judgment. We hold that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Deakins v. MonaghanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. RomerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Kleven v. Yukon-Koyukuk School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. StjernholmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. In Re Marriage of HartleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. USAA v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API