Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schock v. Barnett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1953No. 32544PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

The question presented by this proceeding is whether or not the trial court has the power to consider- a petition for probation, filed by a defendant after the judgment and sentence imposed upon him has been affirmed on appeal.

Defendant was found guilty of a felony by a jury in Yakima county, and sentenced to the penitentiary. He made no motion for probation or for the suspension of the sen tence when it was imposed, but appealed to this court. The judgment and sentence was affirmed. State v. Schock, 41 Wn. (2d) 572, 250 P. (2d) 516 (1952). Rehearing was denied, and the remittitur was filed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. SchockWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Sewell v. SewellWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. McCoske v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Zbinden v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sonner v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. State v. EiltsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. KuhnWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Tembruell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API