Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McCoske v. Kinnear

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1927No. 20752. Department OnePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

French,: J.

This is an application for a writ of certiorari by which petitioner, a prisoner in the state penitentiary, seeks to review the action of the parole board in its refusal to allow good conduct credits on his minimum sentence, 'thus making him eligible for parole before the full term of his minimum sentence has been served.

The good conduct credits to persons in the state penitentiary are granted by reason of the legislative act found in ch. 29, Laws of 1887-8, p. 55, and afterwards reenacted in ch. 147, p. 353, Laws of’ 1891, the same being § 10223, Rem. Comp. Stat., which provides:

“Th…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. In re CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. TyreeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schock v. BarnettWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Spokane & Eastern Branch of Seattle First National Bank v. Justice Court for Spokane PrecinctWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Owens v. SwopeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Rosenthal v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Plumb v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API