State v. Schock
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.
Henry B. Schock was tried for the crime of taking indecent liberties with a minor female. He was convicted, and judgment was entered accordingly. On this appeal, all of Schock’s assignments of error revolve around the receipt in evidence of certain feed store sale slips. They were introduced by the prosecution to rebut the defense of alibi. Appellant argues that the slips were irrelevant and prejudicial; that the prosecuting attorney was guilty of misconduct in connection with the introduction of these exhibits; and that, without the sales slips, the evidence does not support the verdict of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schirmer v. NethercuttWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Keisel v. BredickWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Seth v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. WhalonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- State v. WestlundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- State v. ConklinWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Schock v. BarnettWashington Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.