Legal Opinion

State v. Patch

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Deer Lodge County; Theo. Brantley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

Defendant Patch was convicted of forgery. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order of the district court overruling his motion for a new trial. The charging part of the information is as follows: “The said Everton J. Patch, on the 12th day of July, 1897, at the county of Deer Lodge and state of Montana, did upon the back of a certain certificate of deposit and writing obligatory for money, of the -tenor following: ‘Certificate of Deposit, $60.00. No. 58,344. Hoge, Daly & Co., Bankers, Anaconda, Mont., May 11, 1897. Edw. Dugan has deposited in this bank sixty.... —…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. FerrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Aberdeen v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. City of Pocatello v. FargoIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Lyons v. LyonsDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1915
  4. City of Pocatello v. FargoIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API