Legal Opinion

Blum v. Bush

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Macomb. (Canfield, J.) Bill to quiet title. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

The bill is filed in this case to have a certain deed declared to be without consideration, void, and of no effect, and to have such deed decreed to be delivered up and canceled, and the complainant's title declared to be complete, absolute, and perfect as against defendant, Mary Bush, and she be decreed to release and convey to complainant all the right, title, and interest she has or claims to have under such deed, and she be enjoined from prosecuting a certain suit in ejectment, and from enforcing a judgment in such suit.

Henry Blum, Sr., and his wife, Margarette Blum, were aged people, who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Hunt v. BeesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Nolan v. NolanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Marwick v. AndrewsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1846

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. EnosMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Mansfield v. MansfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Harmon v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Harmon v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API