Legal Opinion

Lee v. Enos

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Grove,. J.) Bill to set aside a sale on execution. Complainants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The complainants are the executors of the last will and testament of Solomon Lee, deceased. They seek by their bill to set aside the execution levy and sale thereunder made by several of the defendants of the life-*278estate of the defendants Leverett J. Lee and Engene Lee in certain lands of the deceased. It is claimed that the title to these lands is held by the executors as trustees, and that Leverett J. and Eugene Lee have no interest in them which is subject to levy and sale.

The testator died February 20, 1881, and his will was duly admitted to probate. At the time of his death he was the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Vinton v. BeamerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Trask v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Cresswell's Adm'r v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Gorham v. WingMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank v. CristSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Lipp v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Fleming v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API