Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Nolan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Bill for a reconveyance of property, and for ah accounting for rents and profits. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Complainant brought his bill against Mary A. Nolan, his wife, and his son, Edward E. Nolan, and his daughter, Annie A. McPherson, to obtain redress *19for a series of transactions whereby he claims he was •defrauded and cajoled out of his property.

As he sets up and shows, he was, in 1880, owner of lot 1, on the Chene farm, on the corner of Chene and Earned streets, in Detroit, of considerable value, varying in estimates from $3,000 to $5,000, as also of some other property. By various arrangements with members of his family, he has been deprived of all his property. He ■claims that this result…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Power v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Blum v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Tomalczyk v. TomalczykMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Evans v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ruby v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API