Legal Opinion
Scripto-Tokai Corp. v. Gillette Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 20, 1992No. CV 91-2862 WJR (JRx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
REA, District Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action to clarify counter-plaintiff The Gillette Company’s (“Gillette’s”) right to recover damages, in its counterclaim for patent infringement, against counter-defendant Scripto-Tokai Corporation. Counter-defendant Scripto-Tokai Corporation is the successor by merger to Scripto, Inc.
The counter-defendant’s motion to clarify Gillette’s right to recover damages came on regularly for hearing before the Court on March 2, 1992. After full consideration of the documented evidence and authorities submitted by the parties, and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Lam, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hall v. DoeringDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- McGinley v. Franklin Sports, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Spectrum Products LLC v. GaoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024