Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Federal Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 16, 1985No. 84-395PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.
This appeal from a declaratory judgment (RSA 491:22) involves questions of an insurer’s duty to defend an insured *231under a homeowner’s policy. The insured, Patrick Jackson, filed a declaratory judgment action against the insurers, Federal Insurance Company (Federal) and Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Merrimack), requesting that they defend him against a suit alleging liability for acts performed by Mr. Jackson as an official of the town of Epping. For the reasons discussed in this opinion, we vacate the judgment of the Superior Court (DiClerico, J.) and order the action for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Cloutier v. Town of EppingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Town of Epping v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Andrews v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Titan Holdings Syndicate, Inc. v. The City of Keene, New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Brien Volpe v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Town of Peterborough v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Binda v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Mottolo v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.