Legal Opinion

Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 11, 1963No. 156, Docket 27777PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Circuit Judge.

In this action the plaintiff seeks a declaration that it is not liable to the defendant on a claim which has been asserted by the defendant, but on which the defendant has failed to bring suit. The district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s claim is time-barred by reason of the provisions of the limitations section of the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 745. We reverse this determination and remand the case for further proceedings.

Since the issue presented here does not involve the merits of the controversy it is…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry BailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  2. Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. Chiste v. Hotels.com L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Joseph Patrick Thomas DohertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API