Legal Opinion

Cloutier v. Town of Epping

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 5, 1983No. Nos. 82-1800, 83-1094, 83-1095, 83-1101 and 83-1138PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.

This “Epic of Epping” concerns a dispute over the development of a mobile home park in Epping, New Hampshire. Wilfred and Mary Cloutier, and Pine & Pond, Inc. are developers who brought the present action in the district court claiming that Epping and several of its officers violated their civil rights by revoking a sewage connection permit, denying them other permits, and engaging in a pattern of harassment aimed at retarding or destroying their development plans. Concluding that plaintiffs had failed to raise a substantial federal question, the court below…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Hector Vega-Rodriguez v. Puerto Rico Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. Henry H. Amsden v. Thomas F. Moran, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. James Chongris and George Chongris v. Board of Appeals of the Town of AndoverCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Norbert C. Pearson, Also Known as Spike v. City of Grand Blanc, J. Larry TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Ruth Blackburn v. Linwood SnowCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API