Hinman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
RAMSEY, Judge.
On the 12th day of July, 1907, an indictment was returned into the District Court of Eastland County charging appellant with seducing one Lela Bareñeld on or about the 15th day of March, 1906.
When the case was called for trial on the 9th day of August, 1907, appellant made application for a continuance on account of the absence and for want of the testimony of Mull Wallace, Clarence Withers, and Mrs.’ M. F. Ames. This motion was not at the time acted upon, but the cause was postponed by the court of its own motion until the 19th day of August thereafter, when it was again…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Snodgrass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Nolan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Merrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
3Cited by21 opinions
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Perkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Eason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Furr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.