Legal Opinion

Nolan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1905No. 3062PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of seduction, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

Appellant complains of the following portion of the court’s charge: “The evidence of the witness Mrs. Willie Bell Stanley made in the office of the attorneys for defendant, in which statement she says that the offense committed by defendant was rape, is admitted for the purpose only of showing that she had made a different statement to what she testified to on the trial, if said statement does show that, and as to whether it does or not, you are the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Fine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Creighton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Crockett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Norman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Hinman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Lusty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Cantu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API