Legal Opinion

Wienholz v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1989No. A042499PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

Deborah M. Wienholz, an incompetent person, by and through her conservator, Barbara Wienholz, (collectively appellant) appeals from a superior court order granting $434,149 in attorney fees to the law firm that settled her medical malpractice action against Kaiser Foundation Hospitals. Appellant contends the fee award should not have exceeded $288,458, which was the maximum compensation permitted under the contingency fee limitations set out in the 1975 version of section 6146 of the Business and Professions Code 1 which was in effect at the time she entered into a contingency…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schultz v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. In Re Marriage of ReulingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. USS-POSCO Industries v. Floyd CaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Center Foundation v. Chicago InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API