Legal Opinion

USS-POSCO Industries v. Floyd Case

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2016No. A140457; A142145PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BANKE, J.

I. Introduction

Defendant and appellant Floyd Case voluntarily enrolled in a three-year, employer-sponsored educational program. He agreed in writing that if he quit his job within 30 months of completing the program, he would reimburse his employer, USS-POSCO Industries (UPI), a prorated portion of program costs. Two months after completing the program, Case went to work for another employer. When he refused to reimburse UPI, the company sued for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. Case cross-complained, asserting the reimbursement agreement was unenforceable and UPI had…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Donald Golden v. California Emergency PhysicianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Christopher Mendoza v. NordstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Hendrickson v. Octagon Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  4. Dragones v. CalkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Fleming v. Matco Tools CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API