Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Center Foundation v. Chicago Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1991No. B035108PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL, J.

The Center for Feeling Therapy and its therapists were sued for medical malpractice and on various intentional tort theories. A dispute arose between the Center and some of its therapists on the one hand, and their insurance carriers on the other, concerning the attorneys selected as independent counsel after the insurers reserved their rights regarding the claims for intentional torts and punitive damages. This appeal is by one of the insurers, Chicago Insurance Company, following a partially directed verdict in favor of the insureds. The record discloses substantial evidence…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chi of Alaska, Inc. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Assurance Co. of America v. HavenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Magana v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. San Gabriel Valley Water Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Scottsdale Insurance v. Homestead Land Development Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API