Legal Opinion
In Re Aikens
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1988No. 19-11118PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Debtor herein objects to the secured status asserted in a Proof of Claim filed by the City of Philadelphia (hereinafter referred to as “the City”) for water and sewer charges on the ground that the City failed to index or to properly docket the liens allegedly giving rise to the secured status of the claim. Although the City’s lien is open to question on several bases, we reject the Debtor’s challenge here, because we find that errors in indexing and docketing judgments and/or liens do not affect the validity of same as between the parties.
The…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Orris v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- In Re MorrisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re LewisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Gardner v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Blakey v. Pierce (In Re Blakey)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Aikens v. City of Philadelphia, Water Revenue Bureau (In Re Aikens)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re AikensUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Orsa Associates, Inc. v. MBA Financial, Inc. (In Re Orsa Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.