In Re Aikens
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
For the second time, we are presented with a challenge by the same Chapter 13 Debtor to the secured status asserted by the City of Philadelphia for $1,046.69 of the amount in a Proof of Claim filed in consideration of delinquent pre-petition water and sewer charges. This challenge, spirited undoubtedly by dictum in our last Opinion, at 83 B.R. 344, 346-47 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1988), that such a challenge might succeed where the past attempt, based on alleged defects in the recording of the lien, had failed, is based upon 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1). Unfortunately…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Franklin Computer Corp. v. Harry Strauss & Sons, Inc. (In Re Franklin Computer Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- In Re MorrisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re Windsor Communications Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Mason v. Benjamin Banneker Plaza, Inc. (In Re Mason)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re TM Carlton House Partners, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Jay Graffen Cass Graffen v. City of Philadelphia, Jay & Cass GraffenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Aikens v. City of Philadelphia, Water Revenue Bureau (In Re Aikens)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Gelletich v. Household Realty Corp. (In Re Gelletich)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Young v. 1200 Buena Vista CondominiumsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.