Legal Opinion
General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Isocyanate Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 14, 1967No. Civ. A. Nos. 3183, 3184PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge..
On March 30, 1966 The General Tire- and Rubber Company (General Tire) brought a patent infringement action, against Murphy Body Works, Incorporated (Murphy) in the Eastern District, of North Carolina. The next day General Tire filed a similar patent infringement action in this District against Isocyanate Products, Incorporated (Isocyanate), Murphy’s supplier. A few hours, later Isocyanate filed a declaratory judgment action against General Tire, also' in Delaware.
After this initial flurry of activity, Murphy moved the North Carolina Court. *869for a stay of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Smith v. McIverSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Telephonics Corporation and Fabrionics Corporation v. Lindly & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Nickerson v. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & JackDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bryan W. Nickerson, Jr. v. Josef Kutschera, A. G. Birkenruth, the Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jefferson Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. M & T Chemicals, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- Windmoller v. LaguerreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.