Legal Opinion

State v. Nerz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1998No. C0-97-1013PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.

Appellant, State of Minnesota, petitions this court to review a decision of the court of appeals holding that the state failed to file an amended criminal complaint against respondents Joan Nerz and Phoenix Medical Services, Inc. within the time period prescribed by an order permitting the state to file an amended complaint. We reverse and in so doing give effect to the plain meaning of the phrase “working days” as contained in the order. The deadline for filing the amended complaint is first calculated by determining the fifth working day from the day…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Mold v. IofredoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. State v. NerzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. A.C. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API