State v. Nerz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s order granting a motion to dismiss based on timeliness, arguing the district court erred in calculating the time provided under the applicable statute. The district court properly determined that appellant failed to file the amended complaint within the prescribed time period. We affirm.
FACTS
Originally, respondents Joan Marie Nerz and Phoenix Medical Services, Inc. were charged by complaint with 11 counts of theft by false representation. In reply to respondents’ motion, the district court dismissed the complaint for lack of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Duhn v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Kenzie v. Dalco Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. PetteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Mold v. IofredoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Simberg v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. NerzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. NorthwayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999