Berlinghieri v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
We establish herein that the “independent judgment” standard (see e.g., Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130, 143 [93 Cal.Rptr. 234, 481 P.2d 242]) should be used in the judicial review of administrative decisions of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) which suspend a driver’s license under Vehicle Code section 13353 (the so-called “implied consent” law; further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise indicated).
On May 15, 1980, plaintiff, a driver/sales person for a business firm, was arrested in Sacramento County for driving under the influence of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Whitesides v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- City & County of San Francisco v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.