Legal Opinion

Hinojosa v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 21, 2009No. CR 08-1336PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELANA CUNNINGHAM WILLS, Justice.

_JjThis court granted the State’s petition for review of the decision in Hinojosa v. State, 103 Ark.App. 312, 288 S.W.3d 718 (2008), in which the court of appeals reversed and remanded appellant Hinojosa’s conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. At issue is whether the circuit court erred by denying Hinojosa’s motion to suppress statements and evidence obtained following a traffic stop. Hinojosa argues that the initial stop was unlawful, and, therefore, his statements and the evidence obtained after the stop were inadmissable under the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. Schmitt DegassoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Laime v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Travis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Craig E. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Roosevelt Whitfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Villanueva v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Heard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API