Legal Opinion

Laime v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 2001No. CR 01-559PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R OBERT L. BROWN, Justice.

The appellants in this case, .David Laime and Jeanna Dodd, appeal from an order denying their motion to suppress drug evidence and statements. They raise seven points on appeal: (1) the state trooper lacked probable cause to make the initial stop of their vehicle; (2) the state trooper had no reasonable suspicion to detain them after proof of the vehicle’s registration was provided; (3) invocation of one’s constitutional rights cannot be grounds for probable cause; (4) the affidavit for search warrant omitted facts regarding the drug dog’s reliability which caused a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Yarbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API