Legal Opinion
McLaren v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided February 12, 1991No. Civ. A. 4-90-460-APublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
McBRYDE, District Judge.
This is a diversity action. Texas substantive law controls. Roberta McLaren (“McLaren”) is plaintiff, and Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Company (“Imperial”), Special Risks, Inc., (“Special”) and Russell Grace, Inc., (“Grace”) are defendants. The matters that are before the court for ruling are (1) Special’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to it because of lack of personal jurisdiction; (2) McLaren’s motion for summary judgment; (3) Special’s motion for summary judgment; (4) Imperial’s motion for summary judgment; and (5) Grace’s motion…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Northfield Insurance v. Loving Home Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- City of Sharonville v. American Employers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Lafarge Corp. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Conrad Bros. v. John Deere Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Shrader & York, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.