Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham Group
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.
The personal injury protection (PIP) provision of the automobile insurance statute permits an unpaid party to bring an action for breach of contract against an automobile insurer if the latter has not paid PIP benefits for more than thirty days after those benefits became due and payable. G. L. c. 90, § 34M, fourth par. If the unpaid party receives a judgment for any amount due and payable by the insurer, it also may recover its costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. The primary question before us is whether an unpaid party who has brought suit and thereafter refused the insurer’s tender of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Peabody Essex Museum, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Ortiz v. Examworks, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Gammella v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- MARK A. ADAMS v. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Byron v. Hartunian, M.D., P.C. v. Pilgrim Insurance Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.