Legal Opinion

King v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1970No. 577PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREEN, Chief Justice.

This is an original mandamus proceeding. Relators King et al. asks this Court to issue its order requiring Respondent Tillman Smith, Judge of the 94th District Court, to enter judgment for defendants based on the incomplete verdict returned by the jury in No. 100,322-C in that Court, styled Adolfo Serna et ux. v. J. C. King et al. We have jurisdiction under the provisions of Art. 1824, Vernon’s Ann.Tex. Civ. St.

Said cause No. 100,322-C is a suit for personal injuries allegedly caused to plaintiffs Serna by the negligence of defendants King et al. in a car-truck…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cortimeglia v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Owens v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Stalder v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Otis Spunkmeyer, Inc. v. Blakely, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. DaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Elliott v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Clayton v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API