Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 16, 1974No. 891PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an original mandamus proceeding. The petitioner has filed with us a motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus requiring the Honorable George Hamilton, Judge of the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, to enter judgment for petitioner based on the incomplete verdict returned by the jury in Cause Number 108, S70-D, styled Mary N. Elliott v. William T. Smith and W. S. Smith, His Father as His Guardian Ad Li-tem and Next Friend. Our jurisdiction, if applicable, is determined under the provisions of Article 1824, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.
The basis for petitioner’s…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Lewis v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Traywick v. GoodrichTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Blanton v. E. & L. Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Chapa v. WhittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Garza v. San Antonio LightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Keller v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Keller v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- in Re Taylor Morrison of Texas, Inc. D/B/A Morrison Homes, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.