Legal Opinion

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Hartman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 22, 1977No. 1285PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an original mandamus proceeding. Relator’s motion for leave to file was grant ed on September 15, 1977, and a hearing on the application for mandamus was held on September 20, 1977. The Respondents, although duly notified, did not appear in this Court.

This Court of Civil Appeals has jurisdiction to entertain the application for writ of mandamus under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1824 (1967) which reads as follows:

“Said Courts or any Judge thereof, in vacation, may issue the writ of Mandamus to compel a Judge of the District or County Court to proceed to trial and judgment in a…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ford Butane Eq. Co. v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Johnson v. Court of Civil AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Traywick v. GoodrichTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Sproles v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Jones v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allied Bank West Loop, N.A. v. C.B.D. & Associates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. Lewis v. YaggiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Beltran v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  4. Garza v. Waco Scaffold and Shoring Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Williams v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API