Curtis & Windham Architects, Inc. v. Williams

OPINION

TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.

In this interlocutory appeal, 1 appellants, Curtis & Windham Architects, Inc., Russell Windham, and William Curtis (collectively “C & W”) challenge the trial court’s order denying its motion to dismiss the counterclaims and third-party petition for damages of appellees, John Eddie Williams and Sheridan Williams. In its sole issue, C & W contends that the trial court erred in not dismissing the Williamses’ counterclaims and third-party claims, which arose out of C & W’s provision of architectural services to the Williamses. 2

We affirm the order of the trial court.