Legal Opinion
S & P CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLLC v. Baker
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided February 18, 2011No. 03-10-00108-CVPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.
S & P Consulting Engineers, PLLC, appeals the trial court’s denial of S & P’s motion to dismiss for failure to file a certificate of merit within thirty days of filing the petition. We conclude that, under the applicable law, appellees were required to file a certificate of merit with their petition regarding all claims for damages arising out of the provision of professional services by a design professional. See former Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 150.002(a).1 Because appellees did not file a certificate of merit regarding such claims with their first…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Melden & Hunt, Inc. v. East Rio Hondo Water Supply CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- M-E Engineers, Inc. v. City of Temple, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
- Nangia v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2011
- Jennings, Hackler & Partners, Inc. v. North Texas Municipal Water District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Doggett v. Robinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.