Legal Opinion

Natex Corp. v. Paris Independent School District

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided November 1, 2010No. 06-10-00052-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MOSELEY.

This is an interlocutory appeal by Natex Corporation, d/b/a Natex Corporation Architects (Natex), a defendant architectural firm, of a denial of a motion to dismiss the suit brought against it by Paris Independent School District (PISD). Natex maintains that dismissal is required because PISD failed to file a certificate of merit pursuant to Section 150.002 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code when suit was initially filed against it. For the reasons set forth within, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In June 2007,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Dunham Engineering, Incorporated v. the Sherwin-Williams Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  2. S & P CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLLC v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  3. M-E Engineers, Inc. v. City of Temple, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  4. TDIndustries, Inc. v. Rivera, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. Hardy v. Matter, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API