Legal Opinion

Bankus v. City of Brookings

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1969PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

For several years plaintiff had operated a water system in the confines of defendant city of Brookings. In August of 1966, he made an agreement with a cemetery association to construct a water line to the cemetery. This required excavating a, ditch of about 2,000 feet in length and 2 feet wide along a, city street. - The city ordinance required plaintiff to obtain a city permit for this purpose. The pertinent sections of - the ordinance are in the margin. The ordinance authorized the city superintendent of streets to issue the permit. The ordinance, it will bé observed, also required a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. City of Milwaukee v. LeavittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mannelin v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. City of Mosier v. Hood River Sand, Gravel & Ready-Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Dykeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Bowen v. Public Employees Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. District Court v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API