Legal Opinion

City of Milwaukee v. Leavitt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1966PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

We start with the premise that the nonresidential uses of the building made between the adoption of the Milwaukee Zoning Ordinance in 1921 and the year 1941 constituted legal nonconforming uses', but that the commercial and industrial uses made subsequent to January 7, 1947 (the date Perssion acquired title) were illegal nonconforming uses. This is because sec. 62.23 (7) (h), Stats., provides:

“Nonconforming uses. The lawful use of a building or premises existing at the time of the adoption or amendment of a zoning ordinance may be continued although such use does not conform with the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State Ex Rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. WielandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State ex rel. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Board of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Park Building Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of ShelbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. SchneiderAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Jelinski v. EggersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. SeigelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API