Legal Opinion

Kimball-Krough Pump Co. v. Judd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1935No. 4500PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Pump Manufacturing Company, sued A. M. Kruger and A. Judd. By its amended petition the appellant alleges that “it is a corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of California, and having its domicile and place of business at Los Angeles, California, doing business by virtue of the laws of Congress regulating interstate commerce,” and for cause of action alleges that plaintiff and the defendants executed a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to sell and the defendants agreed to purchase one Kimball-Krough Centrifugal Turbine Pump,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Cox, Inc. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Southern Casualty Co. v. MorganTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Barton v. Farmers' State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anderson Furniture Co. v. RodenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Bussan v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Hoffer v. Eastland Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Aeronautical Corp. of America v. GossettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Morris v. DrescherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API