Legal Opinion

Southern Casualty Co. v. Morgan

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1929No. Motion No. 8379PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

As noted iñ our original opinion, 12 S.W.(2d) 200, it is manifest that the cause was tried upon the theory that the city of Weatherford had become a “subscriber” under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

In the petition these facts are charged: (a) “On or about the 8th day of September, A. I>. 1925,” the city (Morgan’s employer) “took out a policy” with the casualty company and paid the premium, which policy “was in full force and effect on the * * * 8th day of December A. D. 1925, and at the time of the injury” to Morgan; (b) Morgan, “was covered by the said policy of insurance on the date of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Casualty Co. v. MorganTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Pope v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Indiana & Ohio Live Stock Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Schuster v. L. B. Frendenthal & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Swift v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. McCaleb v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Houston Electric Co. v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Bankers Lloyds v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. C. D. Shamburger Lumber Co. v. DelavanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API