Legal Opinion

Proulx v. D'Urso

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 25, 2004No. 02-P-777PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.

In 1972, the appellee, Jean Paul R. Proulx, purchased two pieces of property in Boxford (shown as lots 4 and 4.1 on the attached plan). A right of way (shown as the “wood road” on the plan) had been established by deeds in the chain of title for the benefit of easterly adjoining lot 3. Proulx thereafter fenced off the wood road and rendered it impassible from the public way outlet, Lily Pond Road. He improved and used as his access from the public way a “gravel driveway” located east of and roughly parallel to the wood road. By the time the appellant, Steven J. D’Urso, acquired lot 3 in 1990,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. DeVriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Davis v. SikesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Desotell v. SzczygielMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. King v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Commonwealth v. FlowersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 107 Manor Avenue LLC v. FontanellaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  2. Pearson v. Bayview Assocs., Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  3. Ho v. Winchester Boat ClubMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
  4. Lindenbaum v. PerezMassachusetts Land Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API