Legal Opinion
Lindenbaum v. Perez
Massachusetts Land Court
Decided July 1, 2021No. MISC 18-000331Published
1Opinion of the Court
LINDENBAUM vs. PEREZ, MISC 18-000331
MARC LINDENBAUM and PAMELA SACCO Plaintiffs, v. MIGUEL PEREZ and JEAN PACHECO, Defendants
MISC 18-000331
JULY 1, 2021
MIDDLESEX, ss.
RUBIN, J.
DECISION
Almost one hundred years ago, in Dubinsky v. Cama, the Supreme Judicial Court considered a five-foot wide passageway easement over registered land in Everett (the "Dubinsky Case," "Dubinsky Decision," and "Dubinsky Court"). 261 Mass. 47 , 51 (1927). That same passageway is once again in dispute, now before the Land Court. On July 2, 2018, Plaintiffs Marc Lindenbaum and Pamela Sacco ("Plaintiffs") filed a Complaint…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Murphy v. Mart Realty of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Dubinsky v. CamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Sheftel v. LebelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Wellwood v. Havrah Mishna Anshi Sphard Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Boudreau v. ColemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.