State v. Creed

In a trial to the court, the defendant was convicted of kindling a fire without a permit in violation of an ordinance (§ 2-9) of the town of Berlin. In his appeal, he assigns error in the court’s *436denial of requested changes in the finding, in the admission of certain evidence, and in the conclusion that on all the evidence the defendant was guilty of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Upon this last assignment of error, we determine from the entire evidence whether the court erred in holding guilt was established by the requisite degree of proof. “It is, therefore, unnecessary to consider…