Legal Opinion
City of Dayton v. Whiting
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1996No. 15432PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wolff, Judge.
The city of Dayton appeals from a judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, which affirmed an order of the Dayton Civil Service Board (“DCSB”) to reinstate Jimmie Whiting as a city employee.
Whiting worked for the city in the Division of Recreation and Parks, Department of Human and Neighborhood Resources. As a result of one charge of misconduct with three specifications, Whiting was discharged from his position effective December 15, 1993. The charge and specifications were based upon allegations that Whiting had made an unauthorized purchase of approximately $850…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Normandy Place Associates v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. Village of GlendaleOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Desantis v. SollerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FoxOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Holfinger v. Stonespring/Carespring, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Liebold v. Hiddens, 21487 (6-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- L.L.L. v. JuniesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Wenzke v. BairdOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.