Legal Opinion
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 2005No. CV-04-0300-PRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 We granted review primarily to consider whether a school district is contractually bound when it has accepted a construction bid but has not yet executed a written contract.1 We conclude that a school district is not contractually bound prior to the execution of a written contract. We exercise juris*420diction pursuant to Article 6, Section 5.3 of the Arizona Constitution and Rule 23 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.
I
¶2 On January 4, 1999, the Washington Elementary School District (the District) solicited bids for the construction of new…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- AROK Construction Co. v. Indian Construction ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Gunty v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- White v. BatemanArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Johnson International, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Gear & Piston, Inc. v. Cummins Power Systems, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Vigilant Insurance v. Sunbeam Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2005
- Sciranko v. Fidelity & Guaranty Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
- Davidson Oil Company v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
- MB Oil Ltd., Co. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.