Legal Opinion

Alexander v. O'NEIL

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1954No. 5681PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

The primary question presented by this appeal relates to the rights of parties under the recording act, Section 71-423, A.C.A. 1939. Plaintiff Marcelious Alexander claims under an unrecorded deed prior in execution, and defendant T. R. O’Neil claims under a deed prior in registry. Plaintiff’s unrecorded conveyance (which for purposes of this appeal is agreed not to be a forgery) is declared by the statute, supra, to be void as against O’Neil, providing the latter was a “purchaser for valuable consideration without notice”.

The essential facts, which are somewhat involved, are as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Ten Eyck v. . WitbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Old Dominion Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Kellogg v. GleesonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Morris v. WicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Continental Forest Products, Inc. v. Chandler Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Carroll v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Peavey v. PellandiniIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Beco Construction Co. v. Bannock Paving Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API