In re Adoption of Mullins
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burnett
We heretofore granted the petition for certiorari in this case because of the legal questions involved which will hereinafter be set forth. The case has been ably briefed, and we now have the matter for determination.
The original petition herein was filed for the purpose of adopting the two minor children. The Department of Public Welfare was made a party as provided by law, under orders of the court, and the matter having been determined below contrary to the position of the Department of Public Welfare by the trial court and the Court of Appeals, the Department filed this petition which was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re DorranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1934
- Kurilla Ex Rel. Kurilla v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Shenton v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Croop v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Fisher & Van Gilder v. First Trust Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe v. SundquistDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
- In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. B-8736Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982